[Yanniv]

For the last three or so seasons, Jason Terry and Manu Ginobili have been arguably the best and most talented bench players in theleague. Terry was last season’s Sixth Man of the Year winner, while Manu got the award in 2008. They’re both 32-year-old shooting guards with resembling attributes on the court. Each can score the ball in a variety of ways: they can get to the basket, hit the long ball, create their own shot and get to the line. No doubt about it, debating who’s better between Terry and Ginobili is a close call.

In 13 games so far this season, Ginobili is averaging his lowest numbers across the board since his sophomore NBA season in 2004, putting up 12.7 points, 3.6 dimes and 2.5 boards a game.

In that same time, Terry has averaged 16.5 points and 3.5 assists a game.

Who's quicker? I think Ginobili. Why? HE IS QUICK ENOUGH TO CATCH A BAT!!!
Who's the better player? You decide.

[Advert Bot]

---

Click here to subscribe and remove ads.

[Sacha]

Ginobili is really fast and yeah he caught a bat!

Jason terry is one of the best clutch player i ever seen, he could do every thing on the court.
drive, pass, shoot long range mid range...

same for ginobili.

it's really a good question. I would choose Ginobili because he also plays in the argentina team.

[PacerFan]

I like Terry, but he's not among the best clutch players ever...

He's not around guys like Reggie, Pierce, and Kobe for the most recent big time clutch players.

[mambaman420]

this should be moved to player comparison forum. but i'll go Ginobli and its not even close.

[Yanniv]

mambaman420, on 15 December 2009 - 01:46 PM, said:

this should be moved to player comparison forum. but i'll go Ginobli and its not even close.

In 13 games so far this season, Ginobili is averaging his lowest numbers across the board since his sophomore NBA season in 2004, putting up 12.7 points, 3.6 dimes and 2.5 boards a game.

In that same time, Terry has averaged 16.5 points and 3.5 assists a game.

You may be right, if were talking on a general manner, but you got to admit tt's very close, vewing the numbers and stats.

[PacerFan]

I think it's Manu when he's healthy.

I don't care at all about the numbers.
Who's the more effective player? Who does more?
It's Manu.

I like Terry too, but I don't think he's better.

[bronevans1]

i give manu the edge

[Sacha]

here are the stats:

Jason Terry: 16.7 points. 1.80 rebounds. 3.4 assists

Manu Ginobili: 13.3 points. 2.80 rebounds. 3.7 assists

( by the way all my stats are from 09-10 season)

[Yanniv]

Sacha, on 17 December 2009 - 11:56 AM, said:

here are the stats:

Jason Terry: 16.7 points. 1.80 rebounds. 3.4 assists

Manu Ginobili: 13.3 points. 2.80 rebounds. 3.7 assists

( by the way all my stats are from 09-10 season)

Manu is better actually, but Terry will step-up during playoff time so its very tough to say...

[soldierno77]

Actually, this is not a close comparison.

Of course, Ginobili is better, by far. He is like the best player in Argentina. And maybe one of the best player in NBA, if he is not so injury prone.

[Sacha]

soldierno77, on 04 February 2010 - 07:39 PM, said:

Actually, this is not a close comparison.

Of course, Ginobili is better, by far. He is like the best player in Argentina. And maybe one of the best player in NBA, if he is not so injury prone.

their stats are almost the same. and Terry is really clutch and yes it's a VERY CLOSE COMPARISON. I don't think he's one of the best in the NBA compared to Lebron, kobe, wade, Durant, Nowitzki and all these stars.
and yeah too bad he got so much times injured

[Yanniv]

Sacha, on 04 February 2010 - 03:46 PM, said:

their stats are almost the same. and Terry is really clutch and yes it's a VERY CLOSE COMPARISON. I don't think he's one of the best in the NBA compared to Lebron, kobe, wade, Durant, Nowitzki and all these stars.
and yeah too bad he got so much times injured

for now ginobili wins...

during playoffs its a different story..

[soldierno77]

Terry is no more clutch than Ginobili.
You should have seen Ginobili plays, then you can see that he made more clutch play than Terry.

[Sacha]

soldierno77, on 04 February 2010 - 10:09 PM, said:

Terry is no more clutch than Ginobili.
You should have seen Ginobili plays, then you can see that he made more clutch play than Terry.

Both of these players have been clutch but I saw so much more clutch plays from Terry.

[AllenIverson#1fan]

I think Crawford's better than oth of them. He does everything for the Hwaks he scores passes etc. He is a deadly scorer and i think he should start over Bibby.He gets 17.6 points OFF THE BENCH!!!

[Sacha]

AllenIverson#1fan, on 04 February 2010 - 10:13 PM, said:

I think Crawford's better than oth of them. He does everything for the Hwaks he scores passes etc. He is a deadly scorer and i think he should start over Bibby.He gets 17.6 points OFF THE BENCH!!!

LOL I agree with you but we are not talking about Crawford haha we are talking about Terry or Manu?

[soldierno77]

Here's another fact to prove that Manu is better:

Spurs' started winning NBA since Ginobili joined on 2003. And the year when they didn't win it, is because Manu is not healthy. So, if he is healthy, you could see them winning more championship.

And Terry never get any championship even though he's healthy most of the time.

[soldierno77]

OOps, double posts...

[Sacha]

soldierno77, on 05 February 2010 - 10:53 AM, said:

Here's another fact to prove that Manu is better:

Spurs' started winning NBA since Ginobili joined on 2003. And the year when they didn't win it, is because Manu is not healthy. So, if he is healthy, you could see them winning more championship.

And Terry never get any championship even though he's healthy most of the time.

Manu is playing this year... do you think they'll win the championship!?
We are talking about the player not the team.
about who's more clutch? who's a better shooter? who's a better defender? etc.

[JeyAyBee]

Manu is better but I like Terry more. With the starting 5 and the VERY DEEP Bench the Mavs have, its nice to see Terry get those kind of stats.